Відео

i love this channel so much, makes engineering tollerable

16:20 I did my final on fourier analysis today.. somehow went worst than I thought

There was this guy named Euler who discovered a few things about these complex numbers… :D

I won a lot of money at video poker....that’s because I was the owner of the machines. Sometimes there were large payouts...but in the end...we won. Nevertheless, most patrons enjoyed themselves. The addicted were a nuisance....always wanting credit. If you didn’t give it, nasty things could happen. Fortunately, this was pretty rare. I enjoy playing video poker, but always take a fixed amount to play with. When it’s gone , I left. If I won, I would buy dinner and leave. Make no mistake, there are runs of bad luck for both the house and the players. If the house doesn’t manage the money properly or there is insufficient patronage, they can go broke. It happened to a friend of mine.

Cool STUFF! 😊 Btw.....was your school on the 10-week quarter system? My school Penn State was on the quarter system until 1983.

What's scary about it ? I was using the Smith Chart when I was in high school - years before I went to engineering school. Very handy tool working with rf and reactive impedances. (in the 1940s and 50s we didn't have cellphones, pocket calculators or desktop computers) - Slide rules and Smith Charts made a lot of engineering calculations so much easier.

A 2D square does not exist ! Anything with an area is 3D !!!

2D exists only in math, not in reality.

As Human beings, we live in a 3D world. We do NOT understand 2D and we don't understand 4D. IN FACT, a 2D square doesn't exist. What you see , is a 3D. It has 2 sides and the height. A square does NOT have an area ! The area exists only in math. Example. When you print a red square on a white page, if that would be a 2D , we wouldn't see the square, we would only see 2 sides

AS A HUMAN SPECIES, WE ONLY UNDERSTAND 3D ! THAT'S IT. WE " THINK" WE KNOW 4D, BUT WE REALLY DO NOT. WE DON'T EVEN UNDERSTAND 2D. 2D IS A SQUARE ONLY THEORETICALLY! ONLY IN MATH. IN REALITY IT IS NOT !!

Finally a great and simple explanation of Fourier Transform after days of searching and jumping from video to another. Thanks man, much appreciated.

"Pi squared over the Declaration of Independence." f(x) = π²/(D of I)

The paradox, if i'm understanding correctly, is that if we assume 3oaK to be the higher ranked hand, that will cause players to interpret all hands containing one pair+joker as 3oaK (rather than 2 pair), which flips the order of scarcity. The thing is though... so what? We should allow that scarcity order to be flipped, because that is not the order that matters. The only thing that matters is the scarcity in our *opportunity* to make a hand from a well shuffled deck, not the scarcity in outcomes post-interpretation. If 2 pair becomes scarce only *because* we choose to discard it, that tells us nothing about how difficult it is to construct that hand from a well shuffled deck, which is the measure that should be tied to ranking. It is always harder to construct 3oaK than 2 pair from a well shuffled deck, even with a joker, so that is the hand that should rank higher.

In our college profs taught us how to solve problems and I thought I know everything about Linear algebra 😂😂

Wait... So you CAN say just "Because"?! I thought it's only Russian thing (English teacher told me so)

Just submitted my college application for chemical engineering let’s see what the future holds….

I find it amazing how much of calculus comes from algebra and geometry and then influences every subsequent field.

Topologists and Set Theorists don't dip their donuts in their coffee. The Topologist says it is because 'they are the same thing'. The Set Theorist says it is because they agree with the Topologist, and that to do so would be 'not well founded' because the same set can't include itself. "Well apart from Keith over there, he insists it's his choice."

I regret picking chemical engineering. Fucking bullshit, I should have picked mech eng

"If a signal travels at the speed oflight through a cable,..." the guy starts out saying, as though that were conceivable. The fact is, electrons drift through cables at a few dozens of miles an hour, and the shock-wave between electrons -- the "information" -- travels at a speed which varies depending on the material and the temperature, and is never more than some fraction of "the speed of light." Even light doesn't travel at the speed of light -- anywhere. It's probably better to think of that speed, c, as "a theoretical speed of causality," which you are never going to witness in reality.

Only autistic stem majors would find this video funny in the slightest.

Stem majors are all autistic

4:18 - 4:40 me in Calculus and Arithmetic class

I love direc delta because remembering that the inverse laplace of a constant is that constant multiplied by the direc delta function gave me 20 extra points on a Circuits 2 quiz

This explains not only Smith Chart, but also why impedance matching is important for high speed signals, and what happens when the match is imperfect

What the hell are imaginary numbers lmao

My friend in comp science had to do linear algebra and calculus also

We should go back to Earth, Air, Fire and Water. Imho.

BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Gravity/acceleration involves what is balanced inertia. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. The fourth dimension AND conservation of energy are consistent with what is E=MC2. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. Frank Martin DiMeglio is correct that THE FOURTH dimension, that stars and planets are points in the night sky, is consistent with the coronal heating “problem”. Great. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. Excellent !!!! Consider what is the BLUE sky. Indeed, consider what is complete combustion AND WHAT IS E=MC2. Great. By Frank Martin DiMeglio

This is the greatest video ever 😂 The end was hilarious

wow , the length of a point is zero , and the length of 2 separate points is also zero and so on. So there are an infinite number of unconnected points in the cantor set ? And therefore only connected points (whatever that means) have length ? Also a point is zero Dimensional so that a point times N = 0 size but N in number of points ?

Holy hell that first one is real. I was in a class that listed a 70 dollar book as required material but it was just the guys diary. Had no relevance to the class and thats all it was. His opinions about stuff

Thanks!

I think chemical engineers gave s lot to do to change Ankit if things in the world.

😮

“Comparison test” bro lowkey listening in class and applying to real life.

So it's just like the game Satisfactory?

This is really well explained

That Circuit in 0:40 is not powered by DC (does not have DC bias) so all the transistor is in cut off state 😅

The speed of sound waves is not c

I remember doing transmission line theory homework in college when my roommate and his friends walked in and saw the smith chart I was using and were like "What the actual hell is that thing?"

I study it in my second year CS bachelors…

Is this a computer science or a fucking math lecture video dude

You had me at knot of hell

I’m taking Real Analysis now, it’s a doozy.

AI is pretty much automatic statistics, so, do with that as you will.

The main thing I've learned studying math is that sometimes people just don't explain things properly. In fact, often no explanation is given at all! You just need to look somewhere else (other textbook, UA-cam, etc.) to find it. Also, if multiple textbooks are available (and they usually are), it's worth finding one you actually like, since you're going to be spending a lot of time with it.

i thank God for these videos

Your Vocal Fry is upsetting.

Thank you Zack for this video.